Arizona Solar Center Blog

Commentary from Arizona Solar Center Board Members and invited contributors.

While blog entries are initiated by the Solar Center, we welcome dialogue around the posted topics. Your expertise and perspective are highly valued -- so if you haven't logged in and contributed, please do so!

The Devil is in the Details

The evolution of clean energy choices got a jolt this week when APS announced plans to lease customers’ rooftops for the purpose of installing utility-owned solar electric systems to feed power directly into their grid.

It sounds like a sweet deal for the 3,000 homeowners they select to participate in the program.  Despite the fact that they won’t receive direct credit for the electricity generated from their own roofs, participating homeowners will be compensated fairly – more or less -- through monthly payments or utility bill offsets.

It also sounds like a sweet deal for the utility that is suffering a public relations backlash from a year-long battle with solar advocates over rooftop solar fees, property taxes and dark money campaign contributions.

This gamble seemingly comes at an opportune time for APS as a brutal election campaign to determine two new utility regulators is heating up on the airwaves and in print. Nonetheless, the proposal is very interesting in that it allows the utility a chance to walk-their-talk by contracting with low-income homeowners that it contends have been left-out of the solar revolution. The utility can also strategically determine where to place the new units within its distribution system for increased reliability.

The plan lets the utility address a number of issues – some real, some imagined and some of its own making.

The bottom-line is it’s a shrewd business decision that finally gets the utility into the rooftop solar business in a big way. After years of standing on the sidelines this provides APS a real-world test of a new business model it has only dabbled with in the past.  It may not be a model that endures – although APS should know what to expect based on lessons learned from a similar pilot project that has been ongoing in Flagstaff for the past several years.  However, the objective of the Flagstaff project is to study the effect of a high concentration of solar electric systems on a feeder line – while this new plan will strategically bolster the grid.

The proposal puts in place an arrangement that can easily transition, sometime in the future, to sell electricity directly to homeowners if their power demands increase as a result of a societal shift toward electric vehicles. In this scenario, it would alleviate the need for infrastructure improvements to meet the new demand.

Not everybody greeted the announcement with enthusiasm.  The news caused a rift among solar electric companies with some welcoming the news because of the increase business it will generate for their operations, while it left another faction fuming at what it believes is unfair competition in an attempt by the utility to gain control of the marketplace.

This rift illustrates just how much the debate has changed in the last few years.  A decade ago no one cared who produced the solar electron as long as it was clean and green. That is no longer the case.

More importantly though, this proposed program validates the game-changing nature the solar leasing model presents and can be construed as a concession on the part of the utility that the benefits of distributed generation are real and add value to grid.

But, as we all know -- the devil is in the details. On the surface this appears to signal a new direction for the utility as it attempts to play catch-up and avoid the same fate as other industry giants that have succumbed to disruptive technologies in their market sectors. 

Immediate reactions around the state varied from praise to denunciation for the effect it would have on future solar development. Instead, hitting the pause button and letting the proposal’s details emerge in a full and balanced hearing seem to be in everybody’s best interest. After all, if the objective is to benefit the grid, the economy, our air and our health – the outcome is too important to be ruled by a rush of emotion rather than patient reasoning.

Jim Arwood
Communications Director
Arizona Solar Center

Question: Is it unfair for the utility to develop new products or services that compete with the private sector – even though those products/services meet its customers’ needs and preferences?

Fighting Obama?

Related Posts